<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sarah Palin and Michelle Obama: hypocrisy in mainstream feminism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://globalcomment.com/2008/sarah-palin-and-michelle-obama-hypocrisy-in-mainstream-feminism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://globalcomment.com/2008/sarah-palin-and-michelle-obama-hypocrisy-in-mainstream-feminism/</link>
	<description>where the world thinks out loud</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://globalcomment.com/2008/sarah-palin-and-michelle-obama-hypocrisy-in-mainstream-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-3319</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalcomment.com/?p=394#comment-3319</guid>
		<description>NMSC, you&#039;re so right. Whenever I see &lt;a href=&quot;http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/ff/Little_Rock_Desegregation_1957.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this picture&lt;/a&gt; I think to myself, &quot;Look at that ungrateful Black woman just ignoring all those gracious white ladies trying to help her!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NMSC, you&#8217;re so right. Whenever I see <a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/ff/Little_Rock_Desegregation_1957.jpg" rel="nofollow">this picture</a> I think to myself, &#8220;Look at that ungrateful Black woman just ignoring all those gracious white ladies trying to help her!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee</title>
		<link>http://globalcomment.com/2008/sarah-palin-and-michelle-obama-hypocrisy-in-mainstream-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-3302</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 23:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalcomment.com/?p=394#comment-3302</guid>
		<description>@NMSC  so do you eat fresh watermelon when you step and fetch it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@NMSC  so do you eat fresh watermelon when you step and fetch it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NMSC</title>
		<link>http://globalcomment.com/2008/sarah-palin-and-michelle-obama-hypocrisy-in-mainstream-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-3294</link>
		<dc:creator>NMSC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalcomment.com/?p=394#comment-3294</guid>
		<description>What an ignorant, factless, citationless, article. Martin ignores generations of white women who have bent over backwards to advance the rights of black women. There has been major outrage over the way Obama has been treated by white feminists. I&#039;m a &quot;WOC&quot; and I&#039;m embarassed by this persistent, ungrateful attitude that poisons the feminist movement. Without white women&#039;s courageous efforts, especially in the last few decades, we would all be screwed. Take a look at how women are being treated by men in our home and ancestral countries. Would you rather be there or would you rather be here where Michelle Obama is our nation&#039;s first lady and, overall, is adored by the media?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What an ignorant, factless, citationless, article. Martin ignores generations of white women who have bent over backwards to advance the rights of black women. There has been major outrage over the way Obama has been treated by white feminists. I&#8217;m a &#8220;WOC&#8221; and I&#8217;m embarassed by this persistent, ungrateful attitude that poisons the feminist movement. Without white women&#8217;s courageous efforts, especially in the last few decades, we would all be screwed. Take a look at how women are being treated by men in our home and ancestral countries. Would you rather be there or would you rather be here where Michelle Obama is our nation&#8217;s first lady and, overall, is adored by the media?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pajamas Media » The Many Faces of Michelle</title>
		<link>http://globalcomment.com/2008/sarah-palin-and-michelle-obama-hypocrisy-in-mainstream-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-3292</link>
		<dc:creator>Pajamas Media » The Many Faces of Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalcomment.com/?p=394#comment-3292</guid>
		<description>[...] was on to something when she worried that people were going to see Mrs. Obama as an &#8220;angry black woman.&#8221; Mrs. Obama came across as both angry and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was on to something when she worried that people were going to see Mrs. Obama as an &#8220;angry black woman.&#8221; Mrs. Obama came across as both angry and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Janeway</title>
		<link>http://globalcomment.com/2008/sarah-palin-and-michelle-obama-hypocrisy-in-mainstream-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-1456</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Janeway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalcomment.com/?p=394#comment-1456</guid>
		<description>Democrats are back in the lead, so good luck to you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democrats are back in the lead, so good luck to you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gaetano</title>
		<link>http://globalcomment.com/2008/sarah-palin-and-michelle-obama-hypocrisy-in-mainstream-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-1454</link>
		<dc:creator>gaetano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalcomment.com/?p=394#comment-1454</guid>
		<description>I just love this lady.She will be a great help to the republican party.She is a lady of class,respect,and truth,but most of all will not take any bulls--- from any one.Mrs. Obammas could only dream about becoming a women like her.She has proven her self and she will be the one for you democrats to try to beat.GOOD LUCK!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just love this lady.She will be a great help to the republican party.She is a lady of class,respect,and truth,but most of all will not take any bulls&#8212; from any one.Mrs. Obammas could only dream about becoming a women like her.She has proven her self and she will be the one for you democrats to try to beat.GOOD LUCK!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Black in America, Human in the World</title>
		<link>http://globalcomment.com/2008/sarah-palin-and-michelle-obama-hypocrisy-in-mainstream-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-1399</link>
		<dc:creator>Black in America, Human in the World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 01:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalcomment.com/?p=394#comment-1399</guid>
		<description>We have known since slavery time that the feminist movement does not support Black American women.  They only court the very notion of our existence when it is convenient for their (whiter) cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have known since slavery time that the feminist movement does not support Black American women.  They only court the very notion of our existence when it is convenient for their (whiter) cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n5p7q</title>
		<link>http://globalcomment.com/2008/sarah-palin-and-michelle-obama-hypocrisy-in-mainstream-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-1387</link>
		<dc:creator>n5p7q</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 22:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalcomment.com/?p=394#comment-1387</guid>
		<description>RE:  Comment #7, Mr. Woollacott&#039;s remarks on comparative &#039;elitism&#039; of GOP and Dems and on Sarah Palin&#039;s speech.

Elitism:  Almost by definition, any American officeholder from state governorship upward is part of the American political elite, regardless of prior personal background.  As governor of an oil-rich state, Sarah Palin holds a unique place among American state governors and has enough political and fiscal clout in Alaska to make her personal background irrelevant.  Her quality of being &#039;every woman&#039; is purely superficial.  &#039;Every woman&#039; doesn&#039;t have Sarah Palin&#039;s political and fiscal power.  To call Sarah Palin &#039;every woman&#039; is to call her a stage prop.  

But it is true that Sarah Palin is not YET a Washington insider, so in that sense she is not an elitist, whereas Barack Obama, a U.S. Senator, is indeed part of the Washington establishment, and the GOP will rightly make hay out of that.

On Sarah Palin&#039;s convention speech:  Her speech was entirely written by McCain&#039;s staff. The &quot;irreverence and sarcasm&quot; were written in by McCain&#039;s staff, although Palin, a former TV sportscaster, delivered other people&#039;s words effectively.

McCain&#039;s staff has also announced that, henceforward, Sarah Palin&#039;s only activity on campaign will be reading written speeches, presumably prepared by McCain&#039;s staff, because &quot;She might make a mistake&quot; otherwise. To my mind, this indicates less a lack of confidence in her poise and lucidity than it indicates a possible rift between Palin and McCain on policy, likely on immigration, which McCain does not want to reveal before the election.

RE: Comment #8, Capt. Janeway&#039;s noting Rove&#039;s exploitation of white racial anxiety.

That&#039;s what troubles me about McCain&#039;s pick of Palin for VP:  It gives white racists a plausible cover for voting against Obama.  Slate.com reports that, according to polls, white women voters are being drawn to Sarah Palin.  Some of that shift may be due to white racial anxiety, and, if so, that may actually win the GOP the election.  That&#039;s depressing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE:  Comment #7, Mr. Woollacott&#8217;s remarks on comparative &#8216;elitism&#8217; of GOP and Dems and on Sarah Palin&#8217;s speech.</p>
<p>Elitism:  Almost by definition, any American officeholder from state governorship upward is part of the American political elite, regardless of prior personal background.  As governor of an oil-rich state, Sarah Palin holds a unique place among American state governors and has enough political and fiscal clout in Alaska to make her personal background irrelevant.  Her quality of being &#8216;every woman&#8217; is purely superficial.  &#8216;Every woman&#8217; doesn&#8217;t have Sarah Palin&#8217;s political and fiscal power.  To call Sarah Palin &#8216;every woman&#8217; is to call her a stage prop.  </p>
<p>But it is true that Sarah Palin is not YET a Washington insider, so in that sense she is not an elitist, whereas Barack Obama, a U.S. Senator, is indeed part of the Washington establishment, and the GOP will rightly make hay out of that.</p>
<p>On Sarah Palin&#8217;s convention speech:  Her speech was entirely written by McCain&#8217;s staff. The &#8220;irreverence and sarcasm&#8221; were written in by McCain&#8217;s staff, although Palin, a former TV sportscaster, delivered other people&#8217;s words effectively.</p>
<p>McCain&#8217;s staff has also announced that, henceforward, Sarah Palin&#8217;s only activity on campaign will be reading written speeches, presumably prepared by McCain&#8217;s staff, because &#8220;She might make a mistake&#8221; otherwise. To my mind, this indicates less a lack of confidence in her poise and lucidity than it indicates a possible rift between Palin and McCain on policy, likely on immigration, which McCain does not want to reveal before the election.</p>
<p>RE: Comment #8, Capt. Janeway&#8217;s noting Rove&#8217;s exploitation of white racial anxiety.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what troubles me about McCain&#8217;s pick of Palin for VP:  It gives white racists a plausible cover for voting against Obama.  Slate.com reports that, according to polls, white women voters are being drawn to Sarah Palin.  Some of that shift may be due to white racial anxiety, and, if so, that may actually win the GOP the election.  That&#8217;s depressing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Janeway</title>
		<link>http://globalcomment.com/2008/sarah-palin-and-michelle-obama-hypocrisy-in-mainstream-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-1386</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Janeway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 22:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalcomment.com/?p=394#comment-1386</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;She’s not an elitist, she’s not a Washington insider, and she honestly looks like she doesn’t give a shit.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If she really doesn&#039;t give a shit, that&#039;s a bad sign for us all. For 8 years, we had someone who didn&#039;t give a shit. Look where it&#039;s gotten us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>She’s not an elitist, she’s not a Washington insider, and she honestly looks like she doesn’t give a shit.</p></blockquote>
<p>If she really doesn&#8217;t give a shit, that&#8217;s a bad sign for us all. For 8 years, we had someone who didn&#8217;t give a shit. Look where it&#8217;s gotten us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Janeway</title>
		<link>http://globalcomment.com/2008/sarah-palin-and-michelle-obama-hypocrisy-in-mainstream-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-1385</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Janeway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 22:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalcomment.com/?p=394#comment-1385</guid>
		<description>Geoff, it isn&#039;t about &quot;believing&quot; in abortion. It&#039;s about deciding whether someone has the &lt;strong&gt;right&lt;/strong&gt; to do it. Do you see the difference at all?

Also, I am honestly and completely troubled by the repeated implication that &quot;Barack Obama is elitist.&quot;

What is the basis for this statement?

Could it possibly have something to do with the fact that people like Karl Rove want to tell white Americans that &quot;this black man thinks he&#039;s better than you&quot;? I think it does. 

Obama&#039;s mother was only 18 when she gave birth to him. His father left his family. He fought for the things he has in life. 

I call BS on &quot;elitist.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoff, it isn&#8217;t about &#8220;believing&#8221; in abortion. It&#8217;s about deciding whether someone has the <strong>right</strong> to do it. Do you see the difference at all?</p>
<p>Also, I am honestly and completely troubled by the repeated implication that &#8220;Barack Obama is elitist.&#8221;</p>
<p>What is the basis for this statement?</p>
<p>Could it possibly have something to do with the fact that people like Karl Rove want to tell white Americans that &#8220;this black man thinks he&#8217;s better than you&#8221;? I think it does. </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s mother was only 18 when she gave birth to him. His father left his family. He fought for the things he has in life. </p>
<p>I call BS on &#8220;elitist.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
