<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Toward a unifying theory of sex</title>
	<atom:link href="http://globalcomment.com/2009/toward-a-unifying-theory-of-sex/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://globalcomment.com/2009/toward-a-unifying-theory-of-sex/</link>
	<description>where the world thinks out loud</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:12:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GlobalComment &#187; The time to hesitate is through: female sexuality in the age of Stupak</title>
		<link>http://globalcomment.com/2009/toward-a-unifying-theory-of-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-5667</link>
		<dc:creator>GlobalComment &#187; The time to hesitate is through: female sexuality in the age of Stupak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalcomment.com/?p=2528#comment-5667</guid>
		<description>[...] few months ago I wrote calling for a frank and open discussion of sexuality, from nuts and bolts issues (reference, yes, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] few months ago I wrote calling for a frank and open discussion of sexuality, from nuts and bolts issues (reference, yes, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hawk65</title>
		<link>http://globalcomment.com/2009/toward-a-unifying-theory-of-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-4533</link>
		<dc:creator>hawk65</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalcomment.com/?p=2528#comment-4533</guid>
		<description>Sarah:
I wrote this glowing note about the above article, extolling you for your clear and thoughtful presentation,but then I ducked off to the side to find a reference for my last comment and lost it all.

Anyway, I wanted to ask if you would look at the interaction power, public/ private suppression and privacy/public-ness of opinion in situations such as Race in American Politics; the political crisis in Iran; White Priviledge and the Other Humans on Earth.

If you&#039;ve already written on an of these topics, please tell me how to find them.

This the reference that I wanted share with you, perhaps it will have some use later:
(The Cress Theory of Color Confrontation)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah:<br />
I wrote this glowing note about the above article, extolling you for your clear and thoughtful presentation,but then I ducked off to the side to find a reference for my last comment and lost it all.</p>
<p>Anyway, I wanted to ask if you would look at the interaction power, public/ private suppression and privacy/public-ness of opinion in situations such as Race in American Politics; the political crisis in Iran; White Priviledge and the Other Humans on Earth.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve already written on an of these topics, please tell me how to find them.</p>
<p>This the reference that I wanted share with you, perhaps it will have some use later:<br />
(The Cress Theory of Color Confrontation)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cunningham</title>
		<link>http://globalcomment.com/2009/toward-a-unifying-theory-of-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-4492</link>
		<dc:creator>Cunningham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 01:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalcomment.com/?p=2528#comment-4492</guid>
		<description>disclaimer:  stoned and didnt plan this out too well.

So i agree with you on alot of this.  Which is boring and Id rather argue for some fun. (another disclaimer? ;o)

I feel that this &quot;libertarian&quot; public opinion comes with maturity and experience.  all tho its becoming easier to be more liberal and less.. say religious ..with sex ed and kids as the generations have been going on.  kids bang more then in my grandmas day i know.  i dont have statistics on this.  dont need em. 

promiscuity is key - will take us in..and out (hmm i noticed thats pun-ish while reading this over ;o)

thing is, we as humans yearn for greatness/deeper meaning/purpose in any level or form we can obtain it.  for many its simply love.  regardless of public opinion on sex, im sure we will always knowing and UNknowingly tie sex with love. even if just fleeting lust.  eventually one person will get attached. then you have drama. not getting attached, in itself is desensitizing and therefor detrimental to these &quot;egalitarian&quot; emotions as a result.
Lets also face it the lower you are on the scale of attractiveness (looks/money/power).  The more attached you will get to whatever partner you manage to get &quot;probable&quot;(copyright my slang)with. leading again simply.. to drama.  from this we smooth over the highs, filling the lows and regard it in the emotionally sterile/clinical or to the polar exmtremes one being, the scandalous.  regardless of media/political tactics, or the big one (imo) religion.

now if this is just purely politic all i will say is.

politics = money = jugular 

&lt;3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>disclaimer:  stoned and didnt plan this out too well.</p>
<p>So i agree with you on alot of this.  Which is boring and Id rather argue for some fun. (another disclaimer? ;o)</p>
<p>I feel that this &#8220;libertarian&#8221; public opinion comes with maturity and experience.  all tho its becoming easier to be more liberal and less.. say religious ..with sex ed and kids as the generations have been going on.  kids bang more then in my grandmas day i know.  i dont have statistics on this.  dont need em. </p>
<p>promiscuity is key &#8211; will take us in..and out (hmm i noticed thats pun-ish while reading this over ;o)</p>
<p>thing is, we as humans yearn for greatness/deeper meaning/purpose in any level or form we can obtain it.  for many its simply love.  regardless of public opinion on sex, im sure we will always knowing and UNknowingly tie sex with love. even if just fleeting lust.  eventually one person will get attached. then you have drama. not getting attached, in itself is desensitizing and therefor detrimental to these &#8220;egalitarian&#8221; emotions as a result.<br />
Lets also face it the lower you are on the scale of attractiveness (looks/money/power).  The more attached you will get to whatever partner you manage to get &#8220;probable&#8221;(copyright my slang)with. leading again simply.. to drama.  from this we smooth over the highs, filling the lows and regard it in the emotionally sterile/clinical or to the polar exmtremes one being, the scandalous.  regardless of media/political tactics, or the big one (imo) religion.</p>
<p>now if this is just purely politic all i will say is.</p>
<p>politics = money = jugular </p>
<p>&lt;3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Jennifer Austin Leigh</title>
		<link>http://globalcomment.com/2009/toward-a-unifying-theory-of-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-4489</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Jennifer Austin Leigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 18:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalcomment.com/?p=2528#comment-4489</guid>
		<description>A wonderful post. Thank you for starting a conversation on a much needed topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A wonderful post. Thank you for starting a conversation on a much needed topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
