Enter your email below to sign up
to our regular news updates.
Close
Global Comment Logo

Jihad vs. McWorld: one man’s terrorist…

Posted on Monday, January 25th, 2010 at 4:13 pm

Author: Renee Martin

On Christmas day, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab allegedly attempted to blow up a trans-Atlantic Northwest Airlines flight arriving from Amsterdam in Detroit. Though he is Nigerian, he has alleged contacts with al Qaeda operatives in Yemen. This event would spur a new round of Islamophobia in which western residents would make apologist arguments regarding violence and paint all those of Muslim faith as violent threats to society.

Rather than dealing with the issues that lead to violent action, the default answer has been racial profiling. Birmingham Labour MP Perry Barr Khalid Mahmood, who is Muslim, stated:

“I think most people would rather be profiled than blown up… It wouldn’t be victimisation of an entire community. If people want to fly safely, we have to take measures to stop things like the Christmas Day plot. Profiling may have to be the price we have to pay. The fact is the majority of people who have carried out or planned these terror attacks have been Muslims.”

This mirrors Anne Coulter’s rhetoric: “Not every Muslim is a terrorist, but every terrorist is a Muslim.” This kind of logic can only be understood if the working definition of terrorist is applicable only to those who practice Islam. It further characterizes all Westerners as good and pure, thereby demonizing Muslims.

On January 4th, it was reported that a Molotov cocktail (bomb) had been thrown inside of largest mosque in Hamilton, Ontario. The mosque is also the home of the Islamic School of Hamilton. The school educates two hundred children between kindergarten and grade eight. Fortunately, no one was injured in the attack. According to the Hamilton Spectator, the police are investigating the attack as a hate crime. This is the second time this mosque has been attacked. Nowhere in the reporting on this incident have the words “terrorist attack” been used.

MP David Christopherson expressed his pleasure that this incident was being investigated by the police and declared, “We have racism in our community, but we are not a racist society.” I suppose it was accidental that both times in which there has been an air attack on the U.S. by a Muslim, this mosque has been attacked. It certainly could not speak to the ways in which Canadians view those practicing the Muslim faith.

According to the L.A Times, a burned and torn copy of the Koran was found during New Year’s Day prayers at the Islamic Educational Center of Orange County. The proximity to the attempted bombing on Christmas Day suggests that this event was meant to terrorize the local Muslim community as a twisted kind of retribution.

The Telegraph reports that Cradley Heath Mosque and Islamic Centre in Plant Street, near Dudley in the West Midlands, was burned to the ground on Boxing Day. The fire crews have determined that the fire was set intentionally:

“This is not the first time we have been targeted,” said Vasharat Ali, secretary of the mosque and Islamic centre. “There was a similar attack four or five years ago.”

It is not only mosques that have been attacked. Muslim women have repeatedly had their headscarves ripped from their heads. Victims like Rehana Sidat have found that the justice system has failed to properly punish the perpetrators. Being ordered to pay fines and issue apologies has done nothing to halt these violent attacks.

Violence against Muslims and desecration mosques is on the rise. We do not see these incidents as terrorist acts or even as interconnected. This kind of compartmentalization allows Westerners to avoid the label of “terrorist,” thus further stigmatizing Muslims.

In news reports, the actions of one become indicative of all of those who practice the Muslim faith. The communal approach to cast a culture and people as deviant is not unique to Muslims; in fact, this is a social practice that we can see in attacks against the GLBT community, Blacks, and the differently abled. What is interesting about this phenomenon is that when it is experienced, it is easy to identify it for what it is; only when our personal biases come to the forefront do we forget what it is to be a victim of this type of profiling and social intolerance.

We often demand that the Muslim community identify those who have violent intentions, yet no such pressure is placed upon the larger Western society to regulate those who are Islamophobic. Their actions are understood to be acceptable, because they are framed as reactionary. This, in turn, erases our communal responsibility for the violent actions that Western governments have engaged in for decades in the Middle East.

Is there really a difference between strapping an explosive to yourself to blow up a building or plane and dropping bombs which kill people whose eyes you will never see? Is there really any difference between the extremist language on Islamic websites and the burning of the Koran or spraying graffiti on the walls of a mosque?

We resist having conversations on our communal responsibility because in Jihad vs McWorld, the roles have already been assigned and everyone knows that not only do the “good guys” wear white, they generally are White. This is specifically why in all of conversations regarding profiling, we continually fail to acknowledge that White Muslims do indeed exist. The policies that the Western world hopes to invoke serve two purposes; they normalize Islamophobia and insist that people of colour are backward and violent. This is seen a win-win for the ruling elite.

Western nations are secular and yet religion is often the basis of sanctioned attacks on Middle Eastern countries. In our decidedly God-fearing societies, we extol the merits of Christianity, pretending that events like the crusades and the Spanish Inquisition did not occur. History can only be your friend when it highlights your virtues rather than reveals that you are a wolf in sheep’s clothing. When Europe was still mired in superstition, the Middle East was the home of human advancement; however, to truly own that history would require admitting that no single group represents the best of human achievement.

McWorld Vs Jihad is truly an outmoded binary. A reductionist understanding of human social engagements just leads to more violence and bloodshed. The supposed victor, in the end, will rewrite the history of these events and the defeated will be silenced and ignored; however, we all will have lost the opportunity to understand that it is our differences, rather than our similarities, which make us a unique and beautiful species. One man’s terrorist will always and forever be another man’s hero. We would at least manage to understand that, if our purpose truly was honouring the sanctity of human life.

Be Sociable, Share!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  1. Aside from how awful and discriminatory profiling is – it’s also stupid.

    What does a “muslim terrorist” look like? Even if we say it for what it really is – profiling of people of arabic descent (remember, the airlines recently had the screaming meemies about a man reciting a Jewish prayer on a plane, so don’t expect educated examination here) – or, to put it anopther way “persecute the brown people” (likely to be a wide net that could catch anyone of middle eastern, mediteranean or latin@ descent)

    Which presupposes all muslims are brown – and not black, white, east Asian – or the thousands of other races that make up the muslim faith.

    OR the idea that all terroists are muslims. Do we so soon forget right wing bombers (oh, no, they’re just individuals – certainly not a comment on their faith/race)? In Britian they say the same thing and I gape. Has the shadows of the Irish Troubles been so soon forgotten?

    And very true – why are not systematic attacks against Muslim communities attempting to terrorise them NOT considered terrorism? Because it would go against our privileged view of what makes a terrorist or not

  2. Jihadis don’t seek the destruction of “McWorld” (that is, global capitalism), they seek the overthrow of moderate Islamic governments in favor of fundamentalist regimes, the spread of sharia law, and the emergence of a new, religiously orthodox caliphate.

    Their main enemies are non-Islamist, majority-Muslim states (see: Pakistan, Indonesia, Egypt, etc.). At the same time, they’re dedicated to the destruction of Israel and the harassment of the United States, with the intention of driving our interests from — and thus lifting our protection on — moderate Muslim states.

  3. “In our decidedly God-fearing societies, we extol the merits of Christianity, pretending that events like the crusades and the Spanish Inquisition did not occur.”

    What school did you go to? I’m a Gen Y’er educated in both Catholic and public schools, and even during my parochial days, I got plenty about those nasty crusades. Our culture is awash in guilt over the wrongdoing of Europeans.

  4. Lovely one and I like that very much and here I have to say that to promote Islam and to meet Muslims from all over the world visit the link and join it and enjoy community better than face book.

  5. Pingback: Jonathon Narvey: Islamophobia phobia | Full Comment | National Post

  6. (quote) “This event would spur a new round of Islamophobia in which western residents would make apologist arguments regarding violence and paint all those of Muslim faith as violent threats to society.”
    ———————

    Apparently, you don’t know an ‘apologist argument’ even when you write one up yourself. And what exactly would your painting us westerners as islamophobic make you?

    And while you do care to inform us as to how many children attend the Hamilton school/mosque, and how fortunate that no one was hurt in the ‘attack’ (sic), you just couldn’t be bothered to mention that the botched Molotov cocktail was tossed sometime during the night and discovered in the morning.

    Maybe we ought to compare that incident with the 300+ Beslan preschoolers (among others), massacred by muslim terrorists.

    ————————————-

    (quote) “Is there really any difference between the extremist language on Islamic websites and the burning of the Koran or spraying graffiti on the walls of a mosque?”

    ————————————–

    Yes, of course there is and then some, but alas, it’s all obviously beyond your present moral and intellectual capacities; indoctrination would do that to you.

    ——————————–

    (quote) “History can only be your friend when it highlights your virtues rather than reveals that you are a wolf in sheep’s clothing.”

    –please, by all means, apply that to yourself for once.
    Look up the 500 yr long attempted eradication or otherwise subjugation of the Indian subcontinent by Muslim hordes, pillaging, raping, enslaving etc, with estimates ranging between 50-100 million deaths, considered the greatest genocidal campaign in human history.

    http://koenraadelst.bharatvani.org/articles/irin/genocide.html

    And do us all a favor, leave the McWorld for the enlightened society you came from.

Get social

rss twitter facebook

Global Comment © 2012 | Design & Developed by : Slate