Corporate interests always win: the silencing of the O’Reilly-Olbermann feud

Glenn Greenwald, the Salon blogger known as much for his stinging critiques of the corporate media as he is for his passionate defense of civil liberties, highlighted this New York Times story about how General Electric, the corporation that owns NBC and MSNBC, collaborated with Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp to quietly silence the public—and occasionally obnoxious—feud between MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann and FOX News’s Bill O’Reilly.

Olbermann is often a blowhard, and his feud with O’Reilly often descended into mere name-calling and spouting off his ratings, but there is no denying that he is a progressive voice on cable news. What’s more, he and MSNBC’s other leftist host, Rachel Maddow, have been as willing to critique behavior from President Obama as they were from President Bush.

Olbermann and Maddow have been the loudest voices in the corporate media calling for attention to Obama’s continuation of Bush policies like indefinite detention, almost as loud as Greenwald himself.

That said, Olbermann (and Maddow) work for MSNBC, which is run by GE. GE is one of the world’s leading weapons manufacturers and one of its largest corporations. No matter how much Maddow and Olbermann may appear to be the good guys, they always have to work within a series of constraints, which are always going to be defined by the interests of the corporation and its profits.

It appears that those profits were being affected by O’Reilly’s tendency to go after GE in retaliation for Olbermann’s attacks on him. Greenwald writes:

Continue reading

Torture – debated

They call it a “debate” like there’s anything to debate. As if international law and Dick Cheney’s snarling are both equally valid. As if torture “working” makes it defensible.

Despite the former Vice President sounding more and more like a cornered wolverine being poked with sticks as he hits talk show after talk show to make the case for his administration’s tactics, the cries are growing louder for investigations into the decisions that made locking a man in a box with a bug crawling over him sound like the best way to get information. The Senate Armed Services Committee Lord of the Flies the movie released a report Wednesday, April 22, which, among other things, lays out a chilling timeline for the interrogation decisions. It also completely disproves Cheney’s “ticking time bomb” scenario argument. Continue reading

Torture – declassified

“Shocks the conscience.”

That’s the test that Steven G. Bradbury, acting head of the Office of Legal Counsel in Bush’s Justice department used to decide whether or not an “enhanced interrogation technique” was torture. I won’t be the only one to suggest, after reading three memos by Bradbury and one by now-Federal Judge Jay Bybee, that perhaps Bradbury doesn’t have much of a conscience to be shocked.

The ACLU has posted the memos, declassified Thursday, April 16th by the Obama administration, on its Web site. They don’t take long to read, but they inspire plenty of shouting at the computer screen.

Spencer Ackerman, at the Washington Independent, describes the memos as “medieval documents,” writing:

Continue reading