Renee Martin. By Renee Martin
Renee Martin lives in Canada and writes the famous Womanist Musings blog. She is as interested in socio-political issues as she is in television.
Posted in Columnist, Society, racism, sports, women | Comments (9)

Is Serena Williams the new Sarah Baartman?

Venus and Serena Williams have dominated tennis since their first appearance in the nineties. Despite being champions many times over, they are still not given the respect that their accomplishment should merit, due in large part to their race and gender. Though we labour under the misconception that we have created a post feminist /racist world, the everyday experiences of women of color prove the mendacity of this social myth.

Words like “menacing,” “threatening” and “aggressive” are often associated with Serena. While these may not seem readily damaging, when one considers that Black women have historically been understood as “unwomen”; this language is an indication of a disturbing trend. Additionally, the epithet “tranny” is often used to insult Serena, thereby asserting that she is not a “real woman.” Though the category of woman is understood to be universally oppressed, white womanhood is perceived to subsume all that is good and desirable about femininity. This is a quagmire that women of color must negotiate to form any basis of self respect or agency.

Since the days in which Saartjie “Sarah” Baartman was forced to reveal her buttocks and labia to curious Europeans in a human circus, the bodies of Black women have been scrutinized and uniformly judged as lacking and/or sub-human. While our bodies may no longer be on display, the fixation with the buttocks of Black women reveals that the “The Hottentot Venus” stereotype is still very much a part of social discourse.

Fox News recently ran a story on Serena in which the author, Jason Whitlock, referred to her as an “underachiever” and called her derriere a “back pack.” It would seem that though she is ranked number two in the tennis world, it is acceptable to claim that her athletic frame is little more than “an unsightly layer of thick, muscled blubber,” because her body does not conform to what is understood as the beauty norm. When Topix ran a survey on who was considered the most beautiful woman, white women received 443 votes or 28% and Black women got 185 or 11% of the vote. While this survey is not necessarily scientific, it does suggest that women of color continue to be understood as occupying the bottom of the race and gender hierarchy.

A person of color must be an overachiever to be understood as successful. The fact that there is even a discussion of the possibility that Serena is not fulfilling her potential reveals the very different standards we have for white and black women. For example, summa cum laude Princeton University graduate Michelle Obama, was not considered socially acceptable until she was constructed as a modern-day black Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis. This is particularly jarring when we consider that at the time that Jackie O was First Lady, her only “social achievement” was marrying into the Kennedy family.

Social theorist Patricia Hill Collins explains that,

“At the heart of both racism and sexism are notions of biological deteterminism claiming that people of African descent and women possess immutable biological characteristics marking their inferiority to elite white men.”

In 2007 at the Sony Ericsson Open, a white male fan yelled out, “Hit the ball into the net like any nigger would.” Clearly the use of the N-word is offensive, yet it was up to Serena to demand that this bigot be removed from the event. The referee and the fans had no issue with his abusive behaviour until she stopped the match and demanded his removal. This signals the audience’s willingness to tolerate even the most abusive forms of racism for the sake of entertainment.

Even as Serena continues to dominate the sport of tennis, she remains a problematic figure because of the social constructions of Black womanhood. The meanings which we have created to support our hierarchy of bodies are inescapable, even to those who have proven their worth and ability on multiple occasions. Serena’s body is representative of the ways in which stigmas interact to create diverse oppressions, or what is known as intersectionality. Until we can divorce ourselves from the idea that race and gender provide grounds to demean, or otherwise oppress, we will never achieve a post-racial or post-feminist world.

This entry was posted in Columnist, Society, racism, sports, women and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

8 Comments

  1. Phil
    Posted July 9, 2009 at 6:31 am | Permalink

    Great article. 100% truth. I am so happy that she has proud parents that raised their family to be proud. I know that she understands that she doesn’t have to prove anything to anyone. Her record speaks for itself. And she has millions of fans and followers that will go to bat for her in a heart beat. Jason Whitlock is a total and complete idiot. His report speaks for him now since he was ignorant enough to say this publicly. At the end of the day, Serena’s will live forever. GO S!

  2. Posted July 9, 2009 at 7:37 am | Permalink

    Jason Whitlock is a notorious blowhard – it’s no wonder he’s employed by Fox News. It’s amazing that Williams’ backside is policed and exoticized while her astounding accomplishments are minimized or dismissed.

    Great article.

  3. Posted July 9, 2009 at 10:37 am | Permalink

    To give you an idea of just how thoroughly the Williams sisters have dominated ‘Williams-don’, the only years in this decade a Williams sister failed to win the tournament were 2004 and 2006.

    Serena was upset in the 2004 finals and Venus lost in the 3rd round to Jelena Jankovic.

  4. NancyP
    Posted July 9, 2009 at 4:44 pm | Permalink

    Who wants to watch top-ranked tennis players that aren’t aggressive etc.? 50 years ago, women were playing a dainty game. No more – power serves, please! I think that it is great that the Williams sisters look like they pump iron and do all-around athletic prep as well as tennis-specific training.

  5. Mark Farnsworth
    Posted July 10, 2009 at 3:40 pm | Permalink

    When Serena was due to meet Sharapova in the Wimbledon final some years ago (i think it was 2004) the Sun’s headline was Beauty and the Best. You do the math. However I would say that the Williams sisters are held very dear by the majority in the UK and since 2000 there has only been one Wimbledon final not to feature at least one of them.

  6. Posted July 11, 2009 at 11:40 am | Permalink

    To echo RMJ, Whitlock is one of the worst sports “journalists” out there, and offers some of the worst high contrarianism this side of Camille Paglia.

    That said, your article is great, and dead-on.

  7. jason
    Posted September 8, 2009 at 7:09 pm | Permalink

    I think muscle girls are beautiful.

  8. Dan
    Posted September 13, 2009 at 7:02 am | Permalink

    Threatening and aggressive seem perfectly apt adjectives to describe Serena Williams bullying behavior at the U.S. Open when she spewed curses and threatened to stuff a tennis ball down the throat of a diminutive line judge.

    It’s impossilbe to empathize with the author’s sense of grievance and ideology when she illustrates it by lionizing the thuggish Serena Williams.

One Trackback

  1. By links for 2009-07-12 « Afrodescendiente on July 12, 2009 at 2:00 pm

    [...] GlobalComment » Is Serena Williams the New Sarah Baartman? (tags: black-body-politics serena-williams race feminism ass) [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>