I have been a practising Christian all my life and a deacon and Bible teacher for many years. My faith is a source of strength and comfort to me, as religious beliefs are to hundreds of millions of people around the world. So my decision to sever my ties with the Southern Baptist Convention, after six decades, was painful and difficult. It was, however, an unavoidable decision when the convention’s leaders, quoting a few carefully selected Bible verses and claiming that Eve was created second to Adam and was responsible for original sin, ordained that women must be “subservient” to their husbands and prohibited from serving as deacons, pastors or chaplains in the military service.
This view that women are somehow inferior to men is not restricted to one religion or belief. Women are prevented from playing a full and equal role in many faiths. Nor, tragically, does its influence stop at the walls of the church, mosque, synagogue or temple. This discrimination, unjustifiably attributed to a Higher Authority, has provided a reason or excuse for the deprivation of women’s equal rights across the world for centuries.
At its most repugnant, the belief that women must be subjugated to the wishes of men excuses slavery, violence, forced prostitution, genital mutilation and national laws that omit rape as a crime. But it also costs many millions of girls and women control over their own bodies and lives, and continues to deny them fair access to education, health, employment and influence within their own communities.
The impact of these religious beliefs touches every aspect of our lives. They help explain why in many countries boys are educated before girls; why girls are told when and whom they must marry; and why many face enormous and unacceptable risks in pregnancy and childbirth because their basic health needs are not met.
In some Islamic nations, women are restricted in their movements, punished for permitting the exposure of an arm or ankle, deprived of education, prohibited from driving a car or competing with men for a job. If a woman is raped, she is often most severely punished as the guilty party in the crime.
The same discriminatory thinking lies behind the continuing gender gap in pay and why there are still so few women in office in the West. The root of this prejudice lies deep in our histories, but its impact is felt every day. It is not women and girls alone who suffer. It damages all of us. The evidence shows that investing in women and girls delivers major benefits for society. An educated woman has healthier children. She is more likely to send them to school. She earns more and invests what she earns in her family.
It is simply self-defeating for any community to discriminate against half its population. We need to challenge these self-serving and outdated attitudes and practices – as we are seeing in Iran where women are at the forefront of the battle for democracy and freedom.
I understand, however, why many political leaders can be reluctant about stepping into this minefield. Religion, and tradition, are powerful and sensitive areas to challenge. But my fellow Elders and I, who come from many faiths and backgrounds, no longer need to worry about winning votes or avoiding controversy – and we are deeply committed to challenging injustice wherever we see it.
The Elders are an independent group of eminent global leaders, brought together by former South African president Nelson Mandela, who offer their influence and experience to support peace building, help address major causes of human suffering and promote the shared interests of humanity. We have decided to draw particular attention to the responsibility of religious and traditional leaders in ensuring equality and human rights and have recently published a statement that declares: “The justification of discrimination against women and girls on grounds of religion or tradition, as if it were prescribed by a Higher Authority, is unacceptable.”
We are calling on all leaders to challenge and change the harmful teachings and practices, no matter how ingrained, which justify discrimination against women. We ask, in particular, that leaders of all religions have the courage to acknowledge and emphasise the positive messages of dignity and equality that all the world’s major faiths share.
The carefully selected verses found in the Holy Scriptures to justify the superiority of men owe more to time and place – and the determination of male leaders to hold onto their influence – than eternal truths. Similar biblical excerpts could be found to support the approval of slavery and the timid acquiescence to oppressive rulers.
I am also familiar with vivid descriptions in the same Scriptures in which women are revered as pre-eminent leaders. During the years of the early Christian church women served as deacons, priests, bishops, apostles, teachers and prophets. It wasn’t until the fourth century that dominant Christian leaders, all men, twisted and distorted Holy Scriptures to perpetuate their ascendant positions within the religious hierarchy.
The truth is that male religious leaders have had – and still have – an option to interpret holy teachings either to exalt or subjugate women. They have, for their own selfish ends, overwhelmingly chosen the latter. Their continuing choice provides the foundation or justification for much of the pervasive persecution and abuse of women throughout the world. This is in clear violation not just of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights but also the teachings of Jesus Christ, the Apostle Paul, Moses and the prophets, Muhammad, and founders of other great religions – all of whom have called for proper and equitable treatment of all the children of God. It is time we had the courage to challenge these views.
Jimmy Carter was President of the United States from 1977 to 1981.
This is what I like about Chavez and Ahmedinejad; they just say whatever they believe in; they have guts. There is a big element of hypocrisy in Carter’s article; he is basically saying now that he is out of office he can challange religious leaders about issues he cares about. Now that he is out office he can dare to write books like Peace not Apartheid. Now that he is out of office he is keen to see democracy spread in Latin America. Now Give me a Break and Give yourself a break Mr. President.
It would have been inappropriate to make such statements while he was President, given the separation of church and state.
@Mark: You might be better prepared to discuss the merits of this article if you actually read it. Carter demonstrates here that he is waking up to an age-old challenge and its long term consequences, and he is choosing to bring his unique resources to work toward solutions. Good for everyone, in my opinion. The issue of systematic discrimination against women clearly will take more than one ex-president, or even all political and/or religious world leaders to (re)solve, so I also choose to work toward a more equal world with my meager yet unique resources. It is not clear where you stand. “Be the change.”
Thank you for your courage in leaving your troubled denomination, and for your clarion call for change in the Southern Baptist Convention. My long respect for you, affirmed by your post-presidential missions and commitment, had been tempered by your long association with the SBC. While I recognize the fidelity and strategy of working for change on the inside, by modeling faith and belief even in the face of insupportable doctrine, there is a time to turn away with principle, to witness with rejection, and to stand out from the dated and destructive nonsense of a failed and distorted interpretation of Christian tradition.
I hope you find a church home now, and I hope you can be listened to and heard by those inside the organization you put behind you. The fusion of right-wing politics with self-serving theology promoted as faith and order by the SBC is a subtle brew, often drunk by those whose genuine desire for communion with God is then polluted by ideology. Faithful believers who cannot or will not see or taste the taint in their denominational edicts do more harm to themselves or each other than even the authors of a corrupted orthodoxy.
The fact that you were once President of the United States obligates you to do the visible good, and I am grateful that, even after this long time, you have made this witness. The intersection of faith and politics can be a disorderly corner, but we are called to reconcile our beliefs with the eternal truths, not the temporal ones. For my daughters, I thank you.
@Larry: Benjamin Franklin once said “Life’s tragedy is that we get old too soon and wise too late”. My point is that he did not commit to the issues he currently cares about when he was a sitting President. And now he is calling on Presidents and leaders to do what he failed to do when he was a President. In fact this demonstrates to the world that he was indeed a weak and hypocrat President and no wonder why he was voted out of office and no wonder why he did not bring the change you brag about.
I don’t recall President Carter ever raising the issue of women’s equality with his Saudi counterparts in the late 70’s; he was more interested to discuss oil prices then. As President, I don’t recall Carter severing relationships with African countries for allowing genital mutilations or persecution of women. Mr. Carter’s record as President demonstrates that Geneder equality was definitely not on the top of his list.
In his article Mr. Carter said “we are deeply committed to challenging injustice wherever we see it”. Why was he not committed to challenging injustice when he was a president. Nobleness, righteousness and leadership are virtues of a president that will not allow injustice to be committed regardless of how contentious the issue is; this is the problem; principles weigh way less than votes when a sitting president is in the white House.
I am not sure When the awakining moment or the big bang occured for President Carter! He probably too had an encounter wih God. Unlike President Bush’s encounter, President Carter was transformed and doomed to become a wise man committed to spreading peace, equality and human rights among people and nations. I agree with you that we should seek to solve solutions that Mr. Carter is promoting but I believe these issues should be tackled by leaders with strong principles and leadership; qualities that Mr. Carter lack.
Thank you, Mr. Carter. You are a very wise man and wonderful humanitarian.
I first learned the painful lesson of gender based discrimination as a very young girl. I continue to be taught that lesson over and over again throughout my life. I’m now 48.
Indeed, some men are lucky enough to be blissfully unaware of what happens in the course of a lifetime to their mothers, sisters, daughters, wives, aunts or grandmothers.
I for one, will not fault Carter for taking this long to break from his Southern Baptist religious base. At least he has the courage to do so. What are the rest of you men doing about it????